5 Modern Risks to your Organisation – No 2. Corporate Travel Insurance
Travel is often a necessary part of conducting business in today's global economy. Unfortunately, on the odd occasion, it doesn't always go smoothly...
Receiving a Letter of Denial for your client’s insurance claim isn’t a particularly welcome outcome, especially if you feel that the insurance claim should have been covered by the policy. However, take comfort from the fact that a denial letter doesn't have to be the end of the road for your claim...
In most cases, an insurer’s position when denying a claim is well substantiated, with denial letters clearly identifying reason(s) why a claim was declined, generally referring to extracts from their policy wording to support the decision.
However, if you or your clients feel an insurer’s decision lacks valid reasoning, or the claim settlement isn’t sufficient for adequate recovery, Whitbread can escalate the claim to the insurer’s Internal Disputes Resolution (IDR) team for further investigation.
Under Australian Law (Corporations Act 2001 – Regulatory Guide 165.1), institutions e.g insurers who are licensed through the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC), are required to have 2 distinct disputes and complaints resolution processes:
These processes are mandatory, and ensure that any disputes or complaints lodged with an insurer are dealt with in a manner that complies with ASIC standards.
Through our in-house claims team, Whitbread take the lead in managing our clients’ insurance claims, and always strive to obtain the maximum settlement possible. As strata claims specialists, we can handle the IDR process on your client’s behalf for the pursuit of a better outcome when things aren’t resolved as expected.
Whitbread take several steps to ascertain on your behalf whether or not a claim should be escalated to an insurer’s IDR team:
If after reviewing the above we believe that the claim should be paid, we will seek your consent to submit the claim to the insurer’s IDR team, and manage the dispute on your behalf.
Upon receipt of an IDR request, an insurer has a period of 15 business days to advise whether their initial decision on the claim will stand or be overturned. From this point there are two potential outcomes:
Should the dispute be resolved in your favour, the insurer will overturn their initial ruling and forward the claim settlement via Whitbread.
However if the insurer still maintains the same ruling, and you are dissatisfied with their reasoning, you can escalate the claim via your insurer’s EDR scheme.
This involves submitting the dispute to the leading independent dispute resolution service, the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), who provide free mediation services for claims disputes involving financial institutions.
For more information on the services provided by FOS visit their website: https://www.fos.org.au/.
Please note that as of 01/11/2018, FOS will form part of a new disputes resolution service known as the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA).
By submitting a claim to the IDR process, both the client and insurers have the opportunity to submit further substantiating evidence that may have been omitted at lodgement i.e. condition reports, pre-damage photos. This information may help shed further light as to the cause(s) of the claim, and prove that damage was due to an insurable event.
a) A ground floor resident of a strata property submitted a claim for water damage due to water seeping through the roof of the bathroom ceiling from the unit upstairs.
Initially the insurer denied the claim, as the damage was deemed to be caused by wear and tear on the upstairs unit’s wastewater pipe (not covered under Strata Insurance), and because the damage appeared not to be from a sudden or unforeseen event. It also appeared to have been caused over an extended period.
Of the belief that the water damaged ceiling should be repaired regardless, Whitbread put forth the claim to the insurer’s IDR team.
While the insurer still declined to provide compensation for the upstairs unit’s broken pipes (as it was specifically excluded from the policy wording), they overturned their decision for the downstairs unit’s damaged ceiling, and provided settlement to pay for repairs.
b) A unit owner and their tenant experienced lengthy delays from both the assessor and insurer when seeking to rectify water damage from a leaking balcony.
With the unit practically uninhabitable i.e. lacking access to the kitchen and having no ceiling, the landlord reached an agreement with their tenant to only pay 50% of the monthly rent, and requested the insurer provide payments under their Loss of Rent cover.
In their original decision, the insurer had refused to provide payments for Loss of Rent as the premises was still deemed ‘habitable’ under the insurer’s policy wording.
Through the IDR process, Whitbread argued that the dwelling was uninhabitable and requested the full Loss of Rent amount be paid to cover the 8 months the dwelling was affected.
As the insurer was liable for the lengthy delays, the initial decision was overturned and the unit owner was compensated for Loss of Rent for the full 8 months.
This article is not intended to be personal advice and you should not rely on it as a substitute for any form of personal advice. Please contact Whitbread Associates Pty Ltd ABN 69 005 490 228 Licence Number: 229092 trading as Whitbread Insurance Brokers for further information or refer to our website.
This Media release from the 10 March, 2018 outlining the latest from the Victorian Cladding Taskforce has been supplied by Minister for Planning, Richard Wynne.
Despite many years of good work in building strong relationships with your strata clients, a Strata Manager’s reputation can become severely tarnished overnight if a crisis isn’t managed effectively.